More Coverage
Twitter Coverage
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA
"Justice delayed is justice denied": Public servant can be held guilty under Prevention of Corruption Act based on circumstantial evidence: Supreme Court, 'mere acceptance of an illegal gratification without anything more would not make it an offence'

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that in a public servant can be held guilty under the Prevention of Corruption Act based on circumstantial evidence in the absence of direct evidence [Neeraj Dutta vs NCT Delhi].
|
A Constitution Bench led by Justice S Abdul Nazeer and also comprising Justices V Ramasubramanian, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, and BV Nagarathna said that the proof of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification can also be proved by circumstantial evidence in the absence of direct oral or documentary evidence.
"In the absence of evidence of complainant (direct or primary), it is permissible to draw an inferential deduction of culpability," the Court held.
However, presumption of fact with regard to demand or acceptance of illegal gratification may be made by a court of law by way of an inference only when foundational facts have been proved, the Court clarified.
The Court further said that in order to prove the demand and acceptance the following aspects have to be borne in mind:
- If there is an offer to pay by the bribe giver without any demand by public servant and the latter simply accepts the offer and receives the illegal gratification, it is a case of acceptance as per Section 7;
- If public servant makes a demand and giver accepts it, it is a case of obtainment. In both cases, the offer and demand have to be proved by the prosecution as a fact in issue;
- Mere acceptance or receipt of an illegal gratification without anything more would not make it an offence under Section 7 or 13(1).
|
The bench also held that there was no conflict in its earlier three-judge bench decisions which gave rise to the Constitution bench reference with regard to the nature and quality of proof necessary to sustain a conviction for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d).
The Court had on November 22 reserved its judgment in the matter dealing with the following question of law:
"Whether in the absence of evidence of complainant/direct or primary evidence of demand of illegal gratification, is it not permissible to draw inferential deduction of culpability/guilt of a public servant under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 based on other evidence adduced by the prosecution?"
The reference to a 5-judge bench arose after a 3-judge bench in August 2019 noted that the law in concern as laid out in its decisions in B Jayaraj vs State of Andhra Pradesh, and P Satyanarayana Murthy vs District Inspector of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh and Another, conflict with its decision in M Narsinga Rao vs State of AP.
|
|
Specifically, the issue was regarding the nature and quality of proof required to sustain a conviction for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act, when the primary evidence of the complainant was unavailable.
In Satyanaryana Murthy, the Court had held that, in the absence of primary evidence of the complainant due to his death, inferential deductions to sustain a conviction was impermissible in law.
In Narsinga Rao, the top court had sustained convictions despite a lack of primary evidence by relying on other evidence and raising a presumption under the statute.
Several appeals under the PC Act had subsequently been adjourned by the top court citing the pendency of the present reference.
Senior Advocate S Nagamuthu represented the lead appellant in the case.
Additional Solicitor General Jayant Sud appeared for the prosecution.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "Justice for sale, affordability varies": In an escalating controversy, Udhayanidhi Stalin's fierce criticisms of Sanatana Dharma lead to public uproar & legal petitions, Supreme Court denies expedited hearing, ‘Won’t allow it, follow standard procedures’
- "To reopen old wounds is to seek healing, not hurt": 34 years past the assassination of Judge Neelkanth Ganjoo for fulfilling his duty still echoes in Jammu and Kashmir, as the SIA reopens this chapter, we are reminded that justice always finds its way
- Hours after Shivling discovered inside disputed Gyanvapi, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi provokes Muslims against court-ordered proceedings amidst chants of ‘Naara-e-Takbeer’ and ‘Allahu Akbar
- "Every sinner has a future": Supreme Court Bench grants bail to Syed Asim Ali, the accused conspirator in the Kamlesh Tiwari murder, which involved a brutal attack that left the Hindu Samaj Party leader fatally stabbed & shot in broad daylight in Lucknow
- Shivling discovered in the Gyanvapi complex during a survey after the water was pumped out of a well that Muslims were using as 'Wuzukhana' for washing their hands and feet before offering Namaz
- "गजवा ए हिंद vision 2047": Delhi HC denies bail to ex-PFI chief E Abubacker, highlighting PFI's Vision 2047 to overthrow the government, replace the constitution with Sharia Law, and establish a Caliphate by 2047 through terror camps & radicalizing youth
- "Waqf Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation; Waqf is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution" says Ashwini Upadhyay: Filed PIL in Delhi HC challenging provisions of Waqf Act
- "Ayodhya hui hamari, ab Kashi-Mathura ki baari": Plea submitted in Mathura Court to secure Shahi Idgah Masjid to protect Hindu sacred artefacts after Shivling discovered at wuzukhana in Gyanvapi premises
- "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles": CJI DY Chandrachud lamented, "Hundreds of young people die in India due to honour killings merely because they love someone or marry outside their caste or against their family's wishes"
- "Every sinner has a future": In the labyrinth of justice, where Chandrakant Jha, with 18 murders, finds another chance at parole, it begs the question: Is redemption possible for everyone, or are some paths too dark to ever find the light again
- "प्यार तूने क्या किया": In Kolkata, 36-year-old divorcee Sanghati Paul stabs 30-year-old Sarthak Das, her live-in partner, multiple times, Das treated her son as his own, Paul confessed to the crime, igniting a city-wide debate on hidden feminism dangers
- "You can tell a lot about a civilization by the quality of people found in its jails": President Murmu’s caution on overcrowding of prisons is a wake-up call to the executive & judiciary, says "Hope you understand what I said and what I refrained from”
- "A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both": Delhi High Court upheld the freedom of speech privilege of the advocacy profession, Justice Mini Pushkarna even refused to look into irrelevance or maliciousness of the statement
- "Justice is blind; that's why it's always bumping into things": Punjab and Haryana High Court, with a generous dash of magnanimity, pressed the pause on Nuh's demolition, playing indulgent parent they took cognizance, giving 'innocent' rioters a breather
- "A verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on": Google moves Supreme Court against National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order upholding CCI's ₹1,337 crore penalty for abuse of dominant position within the Android ecosystem