"Permission marketing is marketing without interruptions": Supreme Court responds to Vice-President; says as per Constitution, Parliament has right to enact law but Court has power to scrutinize it, Govt functionaries comments on collegium not well taken

The Supreme Court on Thursday took an unfavorable view of the comments made by government functionaries about the Collegium system of appointing judges to the High Courts and the Supreme Court.
|
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Vikram Nath, and Abhay S Oka said that the comments are not well taken, and asked Attorney General for India R Venkataramani to "advise them" (such government functionaries).
The Court specifically said that as per the scheme set out in the Constitution of India, while the parliament has the power to enact a law, the power to scrutinize such law vests with the courts.
"Scheme of our constitution requires our court to be the final arbiter of the law. Parliament has the right to enact a law but the power to scrutinize it lies with the court. it is imp that law laid down by this court is followed else people would follow the law which they think is correct," the Court said.
These observations were made in the context of recent statements by Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar, who had said that Constitutional courts quashing changes made by the parliament to the Constitution does not happen in any other democracy.
He had particularly cited the example of the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, stating that the same was passed unanimously in Lok Sabha and unopposed in Raya Sabha; yet it was struck down by the top court.
On November 28, 2022, Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju also termed the collegium system as 'alien' to the Constitution of India.
He said that the Central government cannot be accused of 'sitting over recommendations' made by the Collegium and the judges' body cannot expect the government to simply sign off on all the recommendations made by it.
The Supreme Court bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Abhay S Oka, and Vikram Nath, however, took objections to the remarks today.
"Let people not believe that they will follow a law which they believe is correct. this has larger ramifications. Comments on Supreme Court collegium by the govt functionaries etc is not well taken, You have to advise them, Attorney General," Justice Nath said.
"Any law declared by this court is binding on all the stakeholders," Justice Kaul weighed in
The Court was hearing two pleas - one from 2018 filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), and one filed by the Advocates Association Bengaluru that stated that the Central government's failure to process the names that the Supreme Court Collegium recommended for appointment as judges was in direct contravention of the Second Judges case.
At the last hearing, the bench remarked that the government picking and choosing persons from the names recommended was affecting the seniority of judges.
"Getting successful lawyers to join the profession is difficult in a monetary aspect. But another reason is the tortuous process of appointment and the best first-generation lawyers have declined to be part of the system citing this. This is the grim reality", the Court had remarked.
The top court had also said that the government should not hold names back without expressing its reservations, adding that good people must join the bench and the timeline must be adhered to unless there was an exception.
Earlier, the apex court had sought a response from the Union Law Secretary in the plea.
Pertinently, the bench had remarked that keeping the names on hold was "becoming some sort of a device to compel these persons to withdraw their names".
In its order today, the Court highlighted the delay by the government in clearing Collegium recommendations and how it was affecting the seniority of judges.
"When recommendations are made by SC collegium, the aspect of seniority has to be maintained. This is another aspect govt must look at. Attorney General (AG) assures us that he will look at it. We expect AG to play the role of a senior most law officer," the Court said.
It then posted the case for further hearing next week.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "Justice is blind; that's why it's always bumping into things": Punjab and Haryana High Court, with a generous dash of magnanimity, pressed the pause on Nuh's demolition, playing indulgent parent they took cognizance, giving 'innocent' rioters a breather
- Chennakeshava temple in Belur kicks off 'Rathotsava festival' with Quran recitation: Earlier temple administration requested Muslims to vacate their shops, however, Govt gives their nod for non-Hindus to set up stalls throughout festival
- In a defining moment, India's Supreme Court declined to recognize same-sex marriage rights, placing the onus on Parliament, amidst passionate pleas & dissenting opinions, future of LGBTQ+ unions remains in legislative hands, echoing society's crossroads
- "Ram Lalla Virajman": Meet K Parasaran, the 'Pitamah' of Indian laws, whose dedication to the Ram Janmabhoomi case was a profound dream, his unparalleled devotion saw him argue for hours barefoot, symbolizing his deep faith and commitment to justice
- "No neutrality, there is only greater or lesser awareness of one's bias": Joshimath Sinking - Supreme Court refuses urgent hearing, "there are democratically elected institutions to look into issue & everything of urgency does not have to come to court"
- "Chutiyaram": Delhi’s Trade Marks Registry shockingly approved ‘CHUTIYARAM’ for Sadhna Goswami’s namkeen and biscuits, but later on withdrawing it after two weeks, admitting Balaji’s epic fail let a crude mark dodge Section 9(2)(c), sparking a hearing
- Minimum age of women for marriage is raised to 21 years: Union Cabinet clears proposal
- “Life is a matter of choices, and every choice you make makes you”: In a historic judgment, Supreme Court declared that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancies of 20-24 weeks from consensual relationships on International Safe Abortion day
- "Man versus dog: in this round of alimony Olympics, Fido takes the gold!": In an unprecedented ruling, Mumbai's court insists that man's best friend requires maintenance too, husband now legally obliged to pay estranged wife's canine companions' upkeep
- Supreme Court halts Jahangirpuri demolition of illegal encroachments of rioters by NDMC on priority by keeping aside 70,632 pending cases: PIL filed by Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind, Advocate Dushyant Dave, and Kapil Sibal
- "Faith in judiciary has eroded considerably, need to find out what went wrong": Justice Oka reveals a stark truth that faith in judiciary wrecked, highlighting lower courts' struggles & the CJI's recent admission of mediocrity, calling for urgent reforms
- SC's interim order restraining mosque surveys under the Places of Worship Act sends a troubling signal, empowering mob veto and prioritizing 'harmony' over constitutional rights and judicial independence, raising serious concerns for democracy
- "If it were not for injustice, man would not know justice": Supreme Court stayed arrest of the resigned principal of Indore's Government New Law College, Dr Inamur Rahman, in an FIR registered over "Hinduphobic" book in the college library
- "Re-examine all that you have been told... dismiss that which insults your soul": Supreme Court dismisses plea against appointing Justice DY Chandrachud as CJI, said "No reason to entertain this petition. It is completely misconceived. Thus dismissed"
- "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles": CJI DY Chandrachud lamented, "Hundreds of young people die in India due to honour killings merely because they love someone or marry outside their caste or against their family's wishes"