"Re-examine all that you have been told... dismiss that which insults your soul": Supreme Court dismisses plea against appointing Justice DY Chandrachud as CJI, said "No reason to entertain this petition. It is completely misconceived. Thus dismissed"
The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea against appointing Justice DY Chandrachud as the next Chief Justice of India (CJI) [Mursalin Asijit Shaikh v. Union of India].
|
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India UU Lalit, Justice Ravindra Bhat a,nd Justice Bela M Trivedi considered a petition filed by Mursalin Asijith Shaikh.
"We see no reason to entertain this petition. The entire plea is completely misconceived. Thus dismissed," the Court ordered.
The petition, which was otherwise not listed in the cause list for today, was mentioned for urgent listing by the petitioner's counsel today morning. The counsel requested a posting tomorrow saying that the oath-taking ceremony is on November 9, 2022. CJI UU Lalit then said that the petition will be heard today itself at 12.45 PM.
The petition was filed on the basis of a representation filed by one Mr.Rashid Khan Pathan before the President of India against Justice Chandrachud. The complaint was made viral in social media and WhatsApp groups, which led by the Bar Council of India and several other bar associations to issue public statements strongly condemning the allegations and discarding them as baseless.
|
When the matter was taken, the petitioner's lawyer took objection to CJI Lalit hearing the case, as he had recommended Justice Chandrachud as the successor.
"We're only on the point whether you've made out the case or not", CJI Lalit said.
The counsel that in a case related to COVID vaccination, when a senior advocate appeared, Justice Chandrachud's bench allowed tagging, but when a junior advocate appeared in a similar matter, no tagging was allowed.
The counsel further contended that Justice Chandrachud's bench heard a special leave petition arising out of an order in the Bombay High Court in which his son had appeared as a counsel. "This is an admitted matter, the BCI said that learned judge was not aware that his son was appearing. It cannot be, as the order was annexed", he submitted.
The second issue had already been highlighted by one RK Pathan by way of a complaint to the CJI and the President of India, the plea pointed out.
The plea besides seeking action of contempt of court and other criminal action against Justice Chandrachud, also prayed for a direction to the Central government to refrain from appointing him as the CJI.
At this juncture, CJI Lalit asked the counsel to show proof that the said order was annexed to the SLP. "Show us that the order was part of the paper book?", CJI asked.
The counsel, after struggling for some time to find the annexure, requested that the matter be posted tomorrow. "You said that you were prepared and that is why we decided to hear", CJI did not appreciate the counsel's conduct.
"Whatever you wish to argue, you argue now", CJI told the counsel when he repeated the request to adjourn the hearing.
|
The apex court, however, made it clear that judicial orders passed by a judge cannot be grounds to challenge his appointment.
"You cannot argue or make such points here," Justice Bhat said.
"If you have anything in substance, we are willing to hear you", the CJI repeated.
As the counsel could not advance any further submission, the bench proceeded to dismiss the petition.
The bench, therefore, dismissed the plea.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Uphaar Cinema fire was one of the worst fire tragedies in recent Indian history: Association of Victims of Uphaar Fire Tragedy (AVUT) filed a landmark case considered a breakthrough in civil compensation law in India
- "कृष्णलला हम आयेंगे": Allahabad High Court delivers a historic verdict favoring Hindu devotees in the Krishna Janmabhoomi case, dismissing the Muslim side’s plea and affirming the legal standing of Hindu claims under key acts, marking a judicial milestone
- "To reopen old wounds is to seek healing, not hurt": 34 years past the assassination of Judge Neelkanth Ganjoo for fulfilling his duty still echoes in Jammu and Kashmir, as the SIA reopens this chapter, we are reminded that justice always finds its way
- SC grants protection to Nupur Sharma from arrest in multiple FIRs after pointed out of an imminent necessity for intervention of Court to protect her life and liberty, also noted Chisti’s remarks wherein he asked for cutting of her throat
- "Justice delayed is justice denied": Public servant can be held guilty under Prevention of Corruption Act based on circumstantial evidence: Supreme Court, 'mere acceptance of an illegal gratification without anything more would not make it an offence'
- "अंधा कानून": Rajasthan High Court overturns a decades-old rape conviction, ruling that removing a minor’s innerwear and undressing oneself does not constitute an 'attempt to rape,' but rather 'outraging the modesty of a woman' under Section 354 IPC
- "You cannot deny guilt, and thereby you allow the Curse to be your due": Lower court grants Divorce to husband after 19-years for 20-day marriage, Wife challenges order in High Court, not exceptional case as our courts are flooded with endless litigations
- "अब आयो ऊंट पहाड़ नीचे": A Bareilly court convicts Mohammed Alim for Love Jihad, tricking a woman into conversion and abortion, giving him life in prison, penalizing his father, and warning of conversion threats like in Pakistan and Bangladesh
- Gender Biased Indian Law: Delhi High Court observed that in India, expenditure borne by brother in supporting his divorced sister must be taken into account while passing an order of maintenance in favour of his wife
- “Words have no wings but they can fly a thousand miles“: Justice Ajay Rastogi - "If You decide against the Govt, You will be labeled as an independent judge, if you make a comment against the Govt, everyone including media is happy; this should change"