"The weight of 59 lives demands attention": Supreme Court denies bail to three Godhra train case convicts, emphasizing its severity. The 2002 incident claimed 59 lives, including women and children, leading to widespread riots in Gujarat

In an impactful decision on Monday, August 14th, India's highest court - the Supreme Court - remained unwavering in its stance regarding the Godhra train burning incident of 2002. Despite the pleas, the court chose not to extend bail to three individuals previously convicted in relation to the tragedy.
|
This horrifying incident from two decades ago is etched in India's memory. A malicious, planned attack culminated in the heart-wrenching deaths of 59 innocent pilgrims. Among the deceased were 27 women and 10 children, whose lives were tragically cut short.
The significant case was heard by a panel of esteemed judges, consisting of the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, alongside Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. The gravity of the incident was highlighted by the Chief Justice himself, who pointedly remarked, "The incident is not only severe but also more than just a solitary death."
Emphasizing the urgency of the matter, Chief Justice Chandrachud asserted that it's not a topic to be left in limbo. He firmly stated that the case needs prompt attention and deliberation. "This case requires immediate hearing. We cannot put it off indefinitely," he added.
|
|
While the apex court maintained its position against granting bail at this juncture, there's a glimmer of hope for the convicts. The Chief Justice indicated that a specially constituted bench would take up the matter, suggesting the convicts could try their luck again by presenting their bail pleas to this new bench.
The Sabarmati Express tragedy from February 27, 2002, is one that evokes sharp memories and emotions. On that fateful day, a mob, driven by extremist ideologies, targeted two coaches of the train in Godhra, resulting in a ghastly scene where 59 Hindu karsevaks, comprising children and women, perished in flames.
But the train attack was just the beginning. The incident ignited communal tensions across Gujarat, spiraling into riots that claimed the lives of approximately 1,200 people, injuring several thousands in the process.
Legal proceedings in connection with the incident have been lengthy and complex. Initially, in 2011, a designated court decreed death sentences for 11 of the convicts and life sentences for 20 others. However, a change came in 2017 when the Gujarat High Court, after reviewing the case, decided to modify the death penalties to life imprisonments. The same court, though, confirmed the life terms handed down to the other 20 individuals.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "He who frames the question wins the debate": Adv. Sai Deepak argued his point, "I am sorry to say this, and let me try and tone down the rigour of my submission, to the extent of saying, I believe they have a cause- I just don’t believe they have a case"
- Vinayak Damodar Savarkar – A Misunderstood Legacy
- In an unexpected turn, the Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing her newborn; says High Court, trial court possibly didn't respect her right to privacy, it's enlightening to see how privacy might now overshadow the scales of justice, isn't it?
- Due to high public interest, the Law Commission has extended the Uniform Civil Code feedback deadline by two weeks, meanwhile, AIUDF leader Badruddin Ajmal misinterpreted the UCC, linking it to uniform attire and diet commenting 'sarees-for-all'
- "You cannot expect to get the effect when you neglect to create the cause": 73 years after his death it was Modi who finally brought back ashes of Shyamji Krishna Varma and his wife from Geneva as their last wish to be returned to an independent India
- "Historic seizure": 3,300kg of narcotics worth over ₹2,000 crores captured off Gujarat from an Iranian vessel; Monumental bust includes charas, meth, & morphine, 5 foreigners arrested, its a landmark victory for the Defence Ministry in global drug warfare
- "अरे क्या वकील साब, इतना तो चलता है": In a recent judgment, Madras High Court redefines terrorism; granting bail to UAPA accused Asif Mustahin who expresses desire to join IS, ‘Planning to kill Hindu leaders from BJP, RSS cannot be called a terrorist act’
- “Talking about justice, doing injustice is indeed unfair conduct and hypocrisy”: HC grants divorce citing cruelty by wife who taunted polio-stricken husband's disability, snatched his crutches, manhandled & threw him around, orders man to pay 25L alimony
- "Waqf Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation; Waqf is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution" says Ashwini Upadhyay: Filed PIL in Delhi HC challenging provisions of Waqf Act
- SC bench of Justices Chandrachud and AS Bopanna rules in favor of Muslim petitioner: “Don’t exclude non-Hindus from auction process for shop leases in temple”
- "If it were not for injustice, man would not know justice": Supreme Court stayed arrest of the resigned principal of Indore's Government New Law College, Dr Inamur Rahman, in an FIR registered over "Hinduphobic" book in the college library
- "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles": CJI DY Chandrachud lamented, "Hundreds of young people die in India due to honour killings merely because they love someone or marry outside their caste or against their family's wishes"
- 'Every sinner has a future': Bombay HC suspends Nijam Asgar Hashmi's life sentence, convicted for beheading Umesh Ingale, his girlfriend’s cousin; questions evidence led by Hashmi, who invited Ingale for "sheer khurma" on Eid just to get rid of him
- "लताड़": Madras HC slams Tamil Nadu police for FIR errors in Anna University assault case, orders ₹25 lakh compensation, women-led SIT probe, victim’s fee waiver, action on FIR leak, and police lapses, ensuring privacy, dignity, and justice for the victim
- "Power of the lawyer is in the uncertainty of the law": Kerala High Court - Nudity should not be tied to sex. Mere sight of the naked upper body of the woman should not be deemed to be sexual, Just as beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, so is obscenity