Skip to main content

Wednesday, 6 November 2024 | 07:20 am

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


"The weight of 59 lives demands attention": Supreme Court denies bail to three Godhra train case convicts, emphasizing its severity. The 2002 incident claimed 59 lives, including women and children, leading to widespread riots in Gujarat

Emphasizing the urgency of the matter, Chief Justice Chandrachud asserted that it's not a topic to be left in limbo
 |  Satyaagrah  |  Law
A Grave Incident Leading to Denial of Bail in the Godhra Train Tragedy: A Closer Look
A Grave Incident Leading to Denial of Bail in the Godhra Train Tragedy: A Closer Look

In an impactful decision on Monday, August 14th, India's highest court - the Supreme Court - remained unwavering in its stance regarding the Godhra train burning incident of 2002. Despite the pleas, the court chose not to extend bail to three individuals previously convicted in relation to the tragedy.

This horrifying incident from two decades ago is etched in India's memory. A malicious, planned attack culminated in the heart-wrenching deaths of 59 innocent pilgrims. Among the deceased were 27 women and 10 children, whose lives were tragically cut short.

The significant case was heard by a panel of esteemed judges, consisting of the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, alongside Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. The gravity of the incident was highlighted by the Chief Justice himself, who pointedly remarked, "The incident is not only severe but also more than just a solitary death."

Emphasizing the urgency of the matter, Chief Justice Chandrachud asserted that it's not a topic to be left in limbo. He firmly stated that the case needs prompt attention and deliberation. "This case requires immediate hearing. We cannot put it off indefinitely," he added.

While the apex court maintained its position against granting bail at this juncture, there's a glimmer of hope for the convicts. The Chief Justice indicated that a specially constituted bench would take up the matter, suggesting the convicts could try their luck again by presenting their bail pleas to this new bench.

The Sabarmati Express tragedy from February 27, 2002, is one that evokes sharp memories and emotions. On that fateful day, a mob, driven by extremist ideologies, targeted two coaches of the train in Godhra, resulting in a ghastly scene where 59 Hindu karsevaks, comprising children and women, perished in flames.

But the train attack was just the beginning. The incident ignited communal tensions across Gujarat, spiraling into riots that claimed the lives of approximately 1,200 people, injuring several thousands in the process.

Legal proceedings in connection with the incident have been lengthy and complex. Initially, in 2011, a designated court decreed death sentences for 11 of the convicts and life sentences for 20 others. However, a change came in 2017 when the Gujarat High Court, after reviewing the case, decided to modify the death penalties to life imprisonments. The same court, though, confirmed the life terms handed down to the other 20 individuals.

Support Us


Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.

While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.

Satyaagrah Razorpay PayPal
 ICICI Bank of SatyaagrahRazorpay Bank of SatyaagrahPayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments

If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:

Pay Satyaagrah

Please share the article on other platforms

To Top

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.


Related Articles