"Waqf Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation; Waqf is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution" says Ashwini Upadhyay: Filed PIL in Delhi HC challenging provisions of Waqf Act
Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay has filed public interest litigation (PIL) in the Delhi High Court challenging the Waqf Act 1995. The PIL states that the Act is made under the garb of managing waqf properties but there are no similar laws for followers of other religions. The PIL challenges the validity of various provisions under this act.
Upadhyay pleaded that the Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation. He also highlighted that the Waqf is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.
In his plea, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay said, “If the impugned Act has been made to protect the rights guaranteed under Articles 29-30 then it has to cover all the minorities i.e., followers of Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Judaism, Bahaism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, and not only Islam.”
Upadhyay pleaded that the Waqf Act is against secularism, unity, and integrity of the nation |
The PIL mentions, “Centre cannot make Tribunals arbitrarily beyond the scope of Articles 323A–323B, but if the impugned Act is enacted under Article 245 and Entry-97 of the List-1 of the Schedule-7, then the Tribunal has to perform in consonance with Articles 14-15.”
Advocate Upadhyay’s plea further states, “The Religious Endowment Act 1863, Indian Trustees Act 1866, Indian Trust Act 1882, Charitable Endowment Act 1890, Official Trustees Act 1913, and Charitable and Religious Act 1990 are made to manage trusts and religious endowments of all communities. But rather than unifying them and making a ‘Uniform Code for Trust and Trustees, Charities and Charitable Institutions, Charitable and Religious Endowments and Religious Institution’, Centre has arbitrarily enacted the impugned religion-biased Act against the basic tenets of Articles 14-15.”
The dispute relating to the Waqf properties is decided by the Waqf Tribunal as per the Waqf Act. The PIL also challenges this provision and seeks direction that the dispute relating to religious properties shall be decided by the Civil Court only under Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908.
The dispute relating to the Waqf properties are decided by the Waqf Tribunal as per the Waqf Act |
Earlier, the Supreme Court had refused to hear the plea seeking directions to the central government or the law commission of India to draft a ‘Uniform Code for Trust-Trustees and Charities-Charitable Institutions’ in the spirit of Articles 14 &15 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court’s bench said that it cannot direct the parliament to enact such a law.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Supreme Court stays Allahabad HC order to take over land from Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust: State Govt of UP allotted 400 acres to the Trust that violated the conditions and built a Mosque instead of a university
- Why Hindus not claiming their temples back from the Government control: Is pro-Hindu govt will always be in power
- In another shocker, Supreme Court quotes 'every sinner has a future' and commutes death sentence of Mohd Firoz for rape & murder of 4-year-old girl: Child brutally assaulted, two teeth broken while smothering after rape
- Supreme Court halts Jahangirpuri demolition of illegal encroachments of rioters by NDMC on priority by keeping aside 70,632 pending cases: PIL filed by Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind, Advocate Dushyant Dave, and Kapil Sibal
- Calcutta Quran Petition: A petition to ban the Quran altogether was filed 36 years ago, even before Waseem Rizvi petitioned for removing 26 verses from Quran
- No evidence to tie Dinesh Yadav to violence, intention assumed based on him being Hindu: Anti-Hindu riots by Muslim community that shook the capital city of India and analysis of the conviction
- Writ petition of Irfan scrapped by Allahabad High Court of seeking permission for Azaan on loudspeakers in the mosque, says ‘not a fundamental right’: Read details of the case
- Plea of MP Navneet Rana and husband MLA Ravi Rana to quash FIR for the gruesome and heinous crime of reciting Hanuman Chalisa outside Matoshree dismissed by Bombay HC: Justices stated that it was devoid of merit
- "ॐ नमः शिवाय": A Varanasi court allowed carbon dating of the Gyanvapi mosque, located next to the Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Archaeological Survey of India will carry out the scientific survey of the complex, wait of Nandi may be ending soon
- Mysterious death of Homi Bhabha and new trend started of top Indian scientists dying under mysterious circumstances