“Just a reminder that I’m going on vacation and you’re not”: Plea before Bombay High Court challenges long court vacations; claims such vacations violate fundamental rights of citizens since litigants' right to seek justice is affected by such vacations

A plea has been moved before the Bombay High Court contending that courts taking long vacations is a violation of fundamental rights of citizens since litigants right to seek justice is affected by the such long vacations [Sabina Lakdawala v. Chief Justice of Bombay High Court & Ors.].
|
The petition by one Sabina Lakdawala sought a declaration that closing courts for more than 70 days for any kind of vacation is a violation of the fundamental rights of litigants.
"Such practice of long vacations is liable to be brought to an end," the plea said.
Pertinently, the plea also prayed that the High Court be kept fully functional during the upcoming Diwali vacation by ensuring that an adequate number of judges are available to hear and adjudicate all cases and by issuing directions to the registry to receive all petitions without insisting on permission from the vacation bench.
The petitioner highlighted how the Court had failed to hear another petition of hers despite several requests for an urgent hearing.
This was due to the high pendency of cases and long court vacations contributed to the same, it was submitted.
|
"The long vacations that are a relic of the colonial era have to a greater extent contributed to the further collapse of the justice delivery system that is already on the ventilation. The long vacation suits the convenience of elite lawyers, a microscopic minority," the plea filed through advocate Mathews Nedumpara stated.
Nedumpara told Bar & Bench that the petition will be mentioned before the Bench of Justices SV Gangapurwala and RN Ladhha tomorrow for an urgent hearing.
The petitioner elaborated that despite mentioning her private case on several occasions, the High Court failed to take it up for hearing due to paucity of time.
The petitioner, therefore, urged the High Court to abandon the closure of courts in the name of vacation, a relic of the colonial era which was being followed mechanically and mindlessly.
"Court vacation, a relic of our colonial past, was justified at a time when the majority of the judges were Englishmen who were not adjusted to the extreme summers of India, and they needed long vacations to travel by sea to England. It was a necessity then, today, it is a luxury that the country can ill afford," the petition said.
Lakdawala also acknowledged that while both judges and lawyers need breaks, keeping it limited to weekends and gazetted holidays will suffice the purpose.
"Requisite break for lawyers and judges can be provided without the entire institution being shut down," Lakdawala contended.
She clarified that her contention was not that vacation is denied to judges and lawyers and their workload be increased.
It was only that judges could be encouraged to take leave at different times of the year.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Blast from the past: why DMK government’s idea to melt temple gold is dangerous?
- "हम साथ साथ हैं": A mountain of cash found in Justice Yashwant Varma’s home led to the Supreme Court’s bold punishment—a transfer—because in India’s judiciary, crime sometimes just means changing the nameplate, not facing the law
- "Justice for sale, affordability varies": In an escalating controversy, Udhayanidhi Stalin's fierce criticisms of Sanatana Dharma lead to public uproar & legal petitions, Supreme Court denies expedited hearing, ‘Won’t allow it, follow standard procedures’
- Height of Hypocrisy in the land of Law where accused is hailed and acquitted, but victim is shamed by Court and Church: A timeline of the Bishop Franco Mulakkal case
- “A bench of Justices chosen through collegium got to choose to decide who has the better lawyer”: Karnataka government supports High Court verdict upholding marital rape charges against husband which is another stark violation of human rights
- "Vote: The only commodity that is peddleable without a license": Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Calcutta High Court's direction for deployment of central forces in West Bengal for local body elections, dismisses the petitions by the State and SEC
- Madras High Court: Do not take decision on melting Temple gold till Trustees are appointed
- In a defining moment, India's Supreme Court declined to recognize same-sex marriage rights, placing the onus on Parliament, amidst passionate pleas & dissenting opinions, future of LGBTQ+ unions remains in legislative hands, echoing society's crossroads
- “If you’re good enough to hit the gym at 70, why not a courtroom?”: Age of retirement of Supreme Court and High Court Judges needs to be increased in sync with increase in the longevity and advancement in medical sciences, Parliamentary Committee
- "अरे क्या वकील साब, इतना तो चलता है": In a recent judgment, Madras High Court redefines terrorism; granting bail to UAPA accused Asif Mustahin who expresses desire to join IS, ‘Planning to kill Hindu leaders from BJP, RSS cannot be called a terrorist act’
- Mentally-challenged Tamil Hindu man executed for a drug offense by Singapore whereas India's Supreme Court shockingly commutes death sentence of child rapist and murderer Mohd Firoz
- Tehelka News | In a ground-breaking verdict, the Delhi High Court slapped Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal, Aniruddha Bahal, Mathew Samuel with an order to pay ₹2 crore to Major General MS Ahluwalia following a 2001 sting operation that defamed the ex-Army officer
- "If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable": Secular Court of India - “You can hold Pooja somewhere else" denying permission for Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations at disputed Idgah Maidan in Bengaluru, Kapil Sibal fought and won
- "Mediocre minds usually dismiss anything which reaches beyond their own understanding": Allahabad HC dismisses PIL seeking Judicial Probe into death of 63 children at Gorakhpur Hospital in 2017, UP Govt had terminated services of Dr. Kafeel Ahmad Khan
- "Unheard of:" Bombay High Court deprecated Maharashtra government for keeping a 21-year-old student Nikhil Bhamre in jail for a social media post that did not even name NCP Chief Sharad Pawar