DMK Govt’s move to take over the Ayodhya mandapam using Tamil Nadu HRCE department failed utterly after Madras HC set aside the order: Dravidianists had a meltdown over a win for Hindus
Madras High Court has set aside the order permitting the takeover of Ayodhya Mandapam in Chennai. The Tamil Nadu HRCE department had moved to take over the Mandapam against the locals’ wishes.
Last week HRCE had appointed a fit person to manage the Mandapam’s affairs and forcibly took it over despite protests based on a 2013 court order.
The order was served after allegations of mismanagement surfaced against Sri Ram Samaj who runs the Mandapam. However, later it came to be known that a disgruntled individual had gone to court as his membership application was rejected by the Samaj.
HRCE officials with the help of police took over the Mandapam on April 12. Ram Samaj went to court against this move as the Mandapam doesn’t serve as a temple and doesn’t have murtis installed as per Agama Sastras.
Now, the court has allowed HRCE to conduct an inquiry into the allegations while giving the full control of the Mandapam to Sri Ram Samaj till the inquiry is concluded.
HRCE’s move to take over the Mandapam was perceived as an attempt to threaten those who voted for Uma Anandhan, the sole BJP councilor from Chennai Corporation.
HRCE had appointed a fit person to manage the Mandapam’s affairs and forcibly took it over despite protests based on a 2013 court order |
BJP had extended its support to the locals and Hindu organizations in their protest against the move.
Earlier the court had ruled that the issue should be taken to an appropriate body. The court observed that ‘there was a dispute regarding the installation of idols and poojas conducted by the petitioner and whether the mandapam is a public temple or not’ and dismissed the application filed by the Samaj against HRCE’s notice of taking over.
But the media and HRCE interpreted it as permission to take it over and forcibly entered the Mandapam.
Uma Anandhan, who is also the Vice President of the Temple Worshippers Society, has been relentlessly fighting against government control of temples. She sat in protest in front of the mandapam opposing the takeover.
Speaking to the media, she said that HRCE has no right to take over the mandapam against the Supreme Court verdict. She cited the Chidambaram temple verdict, which said that HRCE could take over a place of worship only if it finds the presence of evil and that it can manage it only till the issue is sorted out.
As Dravidianists had a meltdown over Uma’s win in the local body election, the DMK government’s move to take over the mandapam is seen as a deliberate attempt to push the threshold on temple freedom and harass Hindus who voted for Uma.
Madras HC’s order setting aside the previous order will be dictated tomorrow. Activists expect that the 2013 order will be struck down and Ayodhya Mandapam will be free from government control soon.
Madras High Court has set aside the order permitting the takeover of Ayodhya Mandapam in Chennai. The TamilNadu HRCE department had moved to take over the Mandapam against the locals’ wishes |
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Malaysia and Singapore are allowing temple entry with Covid protocols but here in Tamil Nadu, India Devotees are denied entry to Palani temple on Thaipusam festival: Thaipusam is an important festival of the Tamil community
- Petition seeking restoration of 27 Hindu, Jain temples inside Quwwat Ul-Islam mosque at Qutub Minar complex rejected by Delhi court
- HRCE officials replacing hereditary pujaris with Crash course non-brahmins under the pressure of Christians and Leftist NGOs in Tamil Nadu temple: Breaking the age-old sampradaya to hurt Hindu Dharma
- When Secular Nehru Opposed Restoration Of Somnath Temple - The Somnath Temple treachery
- Why Hindus not claiming their temples back from the Government control: Is pro-Hindu govt will always be in power
- Narasimha Anjaneyar temple demolished in Tamil Nadu despite devotees best efforts to save it, places of worship of other religions are spared
- Narasimha Rao govt brought places of Worship Act as a hurdle in reclaiming ancient Hindu heritage destroyed by Muslim invaders
- Madras High Court: Do not take decision on melting Temple gold till Trustees are appointed
- Proud Kalyan Singh refused to give orders to shoot Karsevaks and chose to resign as CM of UP instead: Karsevaks not only reached atop the dome but had also started breaking it, where Ram Mandir stands today
- Menace of historical oblivion: Hindus have forgotten about a thousand years of Islamic persecution