The Print article essentially contends that Hindus are an acceptable part of society as long as they are willing to relinquish their individual rights and meekly put up with the discrimination meted out against them
How does the Quint know that Shakeel and other "youths" were protecting the temple and not waiting outside to vandalise it when the opportunity presented itself? Well, they take Shakeel's word for it. Why, you ask? Because Muslims never lie. A prominent Muslim had once told us that categorically
At the Nariman House, a Pakistani handler was heard telling one of the LeT terrorists about the significance of the 26/11 attacks in the context of Islam. “Brother, you have to fight. This is a matter of prestige of Islam.
One commonly used hypothesis to explain the effect of Stockholm syndrome is based on Freudian theory. It suggests that the bonding is the individual’s response to trauma in becoming a victim. Identifying with the aggressor is one way that the ego defends itself
When Zubair shared the article, he did so with the purpose of suggesting that the video was not recent and shot in pre-Covid times. In that way, he suggested that such an act by a Muslim man was not a health risk and instead just an 'archaic practice' followed by some Muslims
The persecution of Hindus of Bangladesh--assaults, slaughters, rapes, forcible conversions and displacement from properties--is designed to terrorise the Hindus and ultimately drive them away from that country
Every medieval military campaign flooded Delhi’s markets with slaves, captured from the ranks of enemies who resisted the expansion of Khalji, Tughlaq and Mughal power. “No day goes,” chronicler Shihabuddin al-Umari recorded during Alauddin Khalji’s rule (1296-1316), “without the sale of thousands of slaves”
Right from the first invasion of India by Muhammad Bin Qasim to countless others that followed afterwards, the central Asian marauders not only attacked and plundered India but also took away with them lakhs of women as sex slaves
Khan writes, Moinuddin and Nizamuddin were among the most revered of the Sufi saints. However, instead of adapting a missionary approach towards spreading Islam, they were the spiritual and moral supporters of bloody Jihad waged by Islamic invaders
Support Us | 
