More Coverage
Twitter Coverage
JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA
"My Shelter Days are over, done, Because you, my master, took me home": Bombay HC imposes fine on citizens feeding strays in public places, "If these so-called friends are really interested in protection and welfare of strays, they must adopt those dogs"
In order to tackle the menace caused by stray dogs, the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court recently ordered authorities to impose a fine of not more than ₹200 on citizens who feed them on roads and in public places [Vijay Shankarrao Talewar vs State of Maharashtra].
|
A division bench of Justices Sunil Shukre and Anil Pansare noted that despite measures by the authorities, the menace of stray dogs has increased in Nagpur city because of the irresponsible behavior of some citizens, who feed such dogs on the streets.
It suggested such citizens should adopt the dogs and take them to their homes and feed them.
"These citizens posing themselves as sympathizers and friends of stray dogs offer food packets and different titbits to stray dogs unmindful of the great harm that they are doing to society. These supposed friends of stray dogs do not realize the disastrous consequences of their charity. Fed on the goodies provided by the animal lover, many of the stray dogs become insolent and get even more violent in their behavior towards human beings in general and children in particular," the bench observed.
The bench said that if these so-called friends of stray dogs are really interested in the protection and welfare of the strays, they must adopt the stray dogs, take them home or at least put them up in some good dog shelter homes and bear all the expenses for their registration with municipal authorities and towards their maintenance, health, and vaccination.
"They must understand that real charity lies in taking complete care and not just feeding and then leaving poor creatures to fend for themselves. This is the most basic duty a benevolent must perform if he has real compassion for stray dogs. But the so-called friends of stray dogs shy away from performing this basic duty of theirs and the result is of uncontrolled growth in population and nuisance of stray dogs," the Court said.
The bench, therefore, directed that in general no citizen or resident of Nagpur and areas surrounding it shall feed the stray dogs in public places, gardens, etc.
"We further direct that if any person is interested in feeding stray dogs, he shall first adopt the stray dog/bitch, bring it to home, register it with Municipal Authorities or put it in some dog shelter home and then shower his love and affection on it, may feed it while taking its personal care in all respect. The Nagpur Municipal Corporation to impose an appropriate penalty for any breach of these directions, which penalty may not be more than Rs.200/- for every breach," the bench ordered.
The Court further noted that Section 44 of the Maharashtra Police Act allows the destruction of stray dogs.
It ordered that authorities must consider implementing it though not to the extent of destroying them but detaining them.
"The action that may be taken under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Police Act, we add, may not be of the extreme nature of the destruction of the stray dog but, it can be at least in the nature of detention of the stray dog as per the procedure prescribed and then handing over the stray dog to the Monitoring Committee set up for their appropriate placement/ disposal," the bench ordered.
Taking the overall view of the issue, the judges said, there is a need for the authorities to take charge of the matter, as required under the law, and also the need for samaritans to come forward and render their assistance to the authorities in controlling the stray dog hazard.
"This is not to say that there is something wrong with the view that a dog generally is the best friend of man but, this has to be taken with circumspection when it comes to dogs that are strays and are not kept as pets. Many of these strays are aggressive, ferociously wild, and simply uncontrollable in their behavior," the bench observed.
Advocate FT Mirza appeared for the Petitioners.
Additional Government Pleader DP Thakre represented the State.
Advocate SM Puranik represented the Nagpur Municipal Corporation.
Advocates Ashwin Deshpande and Aradhya Pande appeared as the Intervenor.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Calcutta High Court's landmark judgment illuminates the secular essence of Durga Puja, reinforcing citizens' constitutional rights and India's unity in diversity, a celebration beyond religion, it embodies vibrant spirit of communal harmony & tradition
- "सुरूपा बहुरूपाश्च विश्वरूपाश्च मातरः। गावो मामुपतिष्ठन्तामिति नित्यं प्रकीर्तयेत्": We are living in secular country & must respect all religions. In Hinduism, belief & faith is that cow is representative of divine and should be protected - Allahabad HC
- "In law, not all authorities are 'public'": In a twist that could inspire satirists everywhere, the Bombay High Court clarifies that the Archbishop of Goa isn't under RTI, apparently, divine decrees are no match for bureaucratic ones in the court of law!
- "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles": CJI DY Chandrachud lamented, "Hundreds of young people die in India due to honour killings merely because they love someone or marry outside their caste or against their family's wishes"
- "You can tell a lot about a civilization by the quality of people found in its jails": President Murmu’s caution on overcrowding of prisons is a wake-up call to the executive & judiciary, says "Hope you understand what I said and what I refrained from”
- "Freedom is whatever the Court says it is, pending revision": Kiren Rijiju in Rajya Sabha, "Until we create a new system for Appointment of Judges, issue of Judicial Vacancies will continue to arise which is a big reason for the huge pendency of cases"
- "The miracle isn't that I finished. The miracle is that I had the courage to start": 49th Chief Justice of India, Uday Umesh Lalit's short tenure is a race against time with big plans lined up, he intends to meet head-on the challenges confronting SC
- "बाहर फेंको उठाकर": Jharkhand HC orders the removal of Bangladeshi intruders after revelations of ST girls being converted through marriage and madrasas' involvement, declaring a grave national issue that requires both state and central govt collaboration
- “The truth about injustice always sounds outrageous”: Supreme Court stays death sentence of M Samivel, who raped a minor girl and fearing that the girl might tell someone about the crime, he smashed her head against a tree and dropped her into a pond
- "Power of the lawyer is in the uncertainty of the law": Kerala High Court - Nudity should not be tied to sex. Mere sight of the naked upper body of the woman should not be deemed to be sexual, Just as beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, so is obscenity