More Coverage
Twitter Coverage
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA
"That Allah put thee on the right Way of religion so follow that way... This is a reference to Shariah": Not age but Puberty is the decider, minor girl can marry without parents' consent on attaining puberty, has right to live with Husband: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has observed that as per Mohammedan Law, a minor girl who had attained the age of puberty can marry without the consent of her parents and has a right to reside with her husband even when she is less than 18 years of age.
|
Muslim Law is constructed upon The Quran. The Quran contains references to law forming the basis of Sharia. The Quran is not legal, and therefore Sunnat and Hadis are considered the resources of the law.
Justice Jasmeet Singh observed while granting protection to a Muslim couple who got married in March this year as per Muslim rites and rituals. The plea was moved by the couple seeking directions to ensure that nobody separates them.
The parents of the girl opposed the marriage and registered an FIR under sec. 363 of IPC against the husband. Subsequently sec. 376 and sec. 6 POCSO were added.
According to the girl, she was regularly beaten by her parents and had eloped and married out of her own free will.
As per the status report filed by the State, the date of birth of the girl was August 2, 2006, which showed that she was only 15 years and 5 months on the date of the marriage.
The girl was recovered in April this year from the custody of her husband and her medical examination was conducted at Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital (DDU), Delhi.
The petitioner's counsel stated that the woman is pregnant and the couple is expecting a child together.
After the submissions, the court further referred to various judgments and observed that the object of the POCSO Act states that the Act is aimed to secure the tender age of the children and ensure they are not abused and their childhood and youth are protected against exploitation. It is not customary law specific but the aim is to protect children below the age of 18 years from sexual abuse.
In the present case, it is not a case of exploitation but a case where the petitioners were in love, got married according to the Muslim laws, and thereafter, had physical relationships, the court observed.
It is also clear from the status report that the parties were living with each other as husband and wife. There is no averment that they had sexual intercourse prior to thebeforeage, it held.
Granting protection to the couple, the Court observed:
"It is thus clear that as per Mohammedan Law girl who had attained the age of puberty could marry without the consent of her parents and had the right to reside with her husband even when she was less than 18 years of age and thus otherwise minor girl."
The Court was of the view that the POCSO Act will not be attracted to the present case as it is not a case of sexual exploitation but a case where the couple was in love, got married according to the Muslim laws, and thereafter, had physical relationships.
"The object of the POCSO Act states that the Act is aimed to secure the tender age of the children and ensure they are not abused and their childhood and youth are protected against exploitation. It is not customary law specific but the aim is to protect the children below the age of 18 years from sexual abuse."
It was thus observed that the couple being lawfully wedded to each other cannot be denied the company of each other which is the essence of the marriage.
"If the petitioners are separated, it will only cause more trauma to the petitioner no.1 and her unborn child. The aim of the state here is to protect the best interest of Petitioner no.1," the Court said.
It added "If the petitioner has wilfully consented to the marriage and is happy, the state is no one to enter the private space of the petitioner and separate the couple. The doing of the same will tantamount to the encroachment of personal space by the state."
The Court directed that if the girl desired, she will be at liberty to join the company of her husband.
"The petitioners are entitled to stay together and the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are directed to ensure the personal safety and protection of the petitioners," the Court ordered.
The plea was accordingly allowed.
Case Title: FIJA & ANR. v. State
Punjab and Haryana HC cites Sharia to justify child marriage
Interestingly, this is not the first case where a court has held the marriage of a minor Muslim girl legal. Recently, Punjab And Haryana High Court also justified child marriage by granting protection to a 16-year-old Muslim Girl who married a 21-year-old Muslim boy while noting that she is of Marriageable Age under Muslim Personal Law.
Last year too, the same verdict was passed by Justice Alka Sarin of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. While hearing the plea filed by a 36-year-old man and a 17-year-old girl, she gave the verdict relying on various court rulings and article 195 in ‘Principles of Mohammedan Law’, an authoritative textbook by Muslim personal law jurist Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla, that states: “Every Muslim with a mature mind who has attained puberty can contract marriage. Minors who have not attained puberty can be validly contracted in marriage by their parents.”
|
It is noteworthy that the Parliament had earlier introduced the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill 2021 to increase the marriageable age of girls to 21, equal to that of boys. Furthermore, while introducing the bill, the government said that it would be applicablapplyrl irrespective of religion.
Netizens' Reaction
|
|
References:
livelaw.in
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "The weight of 59 lives demands attention": Supreme Court denies bail to three Godhra train case convicts, emphasizing its severity. The 2002 incident claimed 59 lives, including women and children, leading to widespread riots in Gujarat
- "Man is not what he thinks he is, he is what he hides": Supreme Court rejects plea seeking details of December 12, 2018, Collegium meeting held, "Whatever is discussed shall not be in the public domain. Only final decision required to be uploaded"
- "ॐ त्र्यम्बकं यजामहे सुगन्धिं पुष्टिवर्धनम्": In a Historic win for Hindus, Allahabad HC upholds right to worship at Gyanvapi, dismisses all Muslim petitions, Court orders swift 6-month decision, ASI can survey any part of plot number 9130 (Gyanvapi site)
- SC grants protection to Nupur Sharma from arrest in multiple FIRs after pointed out of an imminent necessity for intervention of Court to protect her life and liberty, also noted Chisti’s remarks wherein he asked for cutting of her throat
- "Man versus dog: in this round of alimony Olympics, Fido takes the gold!": In an unprecedented ruling, Mumbai's court insists that man's best friend requires maintenance too, husband now legally obliged to pay estranged wife's canine companions' upkeep
- Minimum age of women for marriage is raised to 21 years: Union Cabinet clears proposal
- "बाहर फेंको उठाकर": Jharkhand HC orders the removal of Bangladeshi intruders after revelations of ST girls being converted through marriage and madrasas' involvement, declaring a grave national issue that requires both state and central govt collaboration
- In a case regarding child custody of 11-year-old Kanak, Court orders minor girl to be sent to Nari Niketan: Rajasthan
- "He who frames the question wins the debate": Adv. Sai Deepak argued his point, "I am sorry to say this, and let me try and tone down the rigour of my submission, to the extent of saying, I believe they have a cause- I just don’t believe they have a case"
- "Vote: The only commodity that is peddleable without a license": Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Calcutta High Court's direction for deployment of central forces in West Bengal for local body elections, dismisses the petitions by the State and SEC
- "Success & all good things in life, start with a genuine concern for others": Supreme Court collegium publishing RAW, IB opinions on candidates for judgeship a matter of concern, crores of pending cases, delay of justice is denial of justice: Kiren Rijiju
- “Life is a matter of choices, and every choice you make makes you”: In a historic judgment, Supreme Court declared that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancies of 20-24 weeks from consensual relationships on International Safe Abortion day
- Only Dhimmis can be a good Hindu – An article on Shekhar Gupta’s ThePrint argues ‘defending namaz’
- Order of Gujarat State Waqf Tribunal which halted the construction of a railway track near 'Firoz Saheb ni dargah' is set aside by Gujarat High Court
- "Virtue can only flourish among equals": Law Commission of India solicits views & ideas of the public and recognized religious organizations about Uniform Civil Code, interested can present their views within a period of 30 days from the date of Notice